What I don't understand is this: Since Nancy listened to the comments she "inadvertently" taped and then admits that she understood by listening to them that these comments were PERSONAL in nature -- then WHY did she feel it "necessary" to inform her editor about them? Why didn't she just delete the comments (or ignore them) which would have been the COURTEOUS thing to do. If she had simply done that in the first place, she'd still have her job and the Common Council would be arguing over something else equally as stupid. View Comment